Hepburn v. Kincannon

74 Miss. 691
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1897·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Whitfield, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question involved in this case is, whether the receiver of a national bank can collect from a stockholder in said bank a note given for capital stock, and that he can is settled by the cases cited by counsel for appellant, in which the reasons are fully stated. See, especially, National Bank v. Case, 99 U. S., 628; Gold Mining Co. v. National Bank, 96 U. S., 640, and National Bank v. Matthews, 98 U. S., 621, and Logan County Bank v. Townsend, 139 U. S., 67, a case where, e converso, the bank was held liable.

The demurrers to the second, fourth and amended sixth pleas should have been sustained, and are now sustained, the judgment reversed and the cause

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hepburn v. Kincannon, 74 Miss. 691 (Mich. 1897).

74 Miss. 691 (Hepburn v. Kincannon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aldrich v. Rice
138 So. 570 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1932)
St. Francois County Bank v. Hawn
296 S.W. 1052 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1927)
Ellis Jones Drug Co. v. Williams
103 So. 810 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1925)