Hepburn v. Gaston

3 N.J.L. 623
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 15, 1810
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 623 (Hepburn v. Gaston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hepburn v. Gaston, 3 N.J.L. 623 (N.J. 1810).

Opinion

By the Court.

Whether these charges were for a tavern debt or not, was a proper subject for the determination of the jury; the justice ought not, in such case, to nonsuit the plaintiff; but to let the facts be tried by a jury. It is, to he sure, the duty of the justice to explain the law to the jury, and charge them as to the law arising out of the facts in the cause. From the appearance of the account, there is reason to believe that the jury have erred; hut we cannot perceive any legal ground on which we can reverse the judgment of the justice. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hepburn-v-gaston-nj-1810.