Heos v. Ladner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Heos v. Ladner

282 A.D. 707, 122 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4751

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 707 (Heos v. Ladner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heos v. Ladner, 282 A.D. 707, 122 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order referring respondent’s motion to vacate a judgment against him entered December 7, 1936, and the body execution issued thereunder in favor of Peter Heos, to an Official Referee to hear and determine, and from an order denying the motion of his administratrix to resettle the aforesaid order so as to recite all the papers used on the original motion and to change the relief granted in an insubstantial particular. Appeal by plaintiff Theodore Heos from the orders dismissed, without costs. That plaintiff is not a party to the present applications. As to the other appellant, orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. The question of the power of the Special Term to refer the motion to an Official Referee to hear and determine was withdrawn on the argument of the appeal. There is no error in the orders in other respects. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 740 ; 283 App. Div. 670.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order referring respondent’s motion to vacate a judgment against him entered December 7, 1936, and the body execution issued thereunder in favor of Peter Heos, to an Official Referee to hear and determine, and from an order denying the motion of his administratrix to resettle the aforesaid order so as to recite all the papers used on the original motion and to change the relief granted in an insubstantial particular. Appeal by plaintiff Theodore Heos from the orders dismissed, without costs. That plaintiff is not a party to the present applications. As to the other appellant, orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. The question of the power of the Special Term to refer the motion to an Official Referee to hear and determine was withdrawn on the argument of the appeal. There is no error in the orders in other respects. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 740 ; 283 App. Div. 670.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 707, 122 N.Y.S.2d 119, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heos-v-ladner-nyappdiv-1953.