Heos v. Ladner
279 A.D. 1093, 112 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5956
Opinion
(Davidson V. Sterngass, 279 App. Div. 875.) Application by the Sheriff, named as a defendant-respondent in the notices of appeal, to dismiss the appeals as to him, denied, without costs, in view of the fact that the order to show cause required service on him, and the orders appealed from required him to produce the defendant Ladner before the Official Referee. Present — Nolan, P. J., Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See post, p. 1095.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heos v. Ladner, 279 A.D. 1093, 112 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 1093 (Heos v. Ladner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davidson v. Sterngass
279 A.D. 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)