Heos v. Ladner

279 A.D. 1093, 112 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5956

This text of 279 A.D. 1093 (Heos v. Ladner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heos v. Ladner, 279 A.D. 1093, 112 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5956 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

(Davidson V. Sterngass, 279 App. Div. 875.) Application by the Sheriff, named as a defendant-respondent in the notices of appeal, to dismiss the appeals as to him, denied, without costs, in view of the fact that the order to show cause required service on him, and the orders appealed from required him to produce the defendant Ladner before the Official Referee. Present — Nolan, P. J., Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See post, p. 1095.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davidson v. Sterngass
279 A.D. 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 1093, 112 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heos-v-ladner-nyappdiv-1952.