Heos v. Ladner
This text of 279 A.D. 1093 (Heos v. Ladner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(Davidson V. Sterngass, 279 App. Div. 875.) Application by the Sheriff, named as a defendant-respondent in the notices of appeal, to dismiss the appeals as to him, denied, without costs, in view of the fact that the order to show cause required service on him, and the orders appealed from required him to produce the defendant Ladner before the Official Referee. Present — Nolan, P. J., Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See post, p. 1095.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 A.D. 1093, 112 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heos-v-ladner-nyappdiv-1952.