Henzel v. Cipra
171 So. 2d 583
This text of 171 So. 2d 583 (Henzel v. Cipra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Henzel v. Cipra, 171 So. 2d 583 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).
Opinion
The defendant appeals an order striking his pleading and entering a default against him. The record supports the finding of the chancellor that the defendant, appcl-[584]*584lant, had wilfully violated the orders of the court.
The order is affirmed. See Rashard v. Cappiali, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 581 [opinion filed February 9, 1965].
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rashard v. Cappiali
171 So. 2d 581 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
171 So. 2d 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henzel-v-cipra-fladistctapp-1965.