Henzel v. California Electrical Works

Ninth Circuit

Henzel v. California Electrical Works

51 F. 754, 2 C.C.A. 495, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1328

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 18, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 51 F. 754 (Henzel v. California Electrical Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henzel v. California Electrical Works, 51 F. 754, 2 C.C.A. 495, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1328 (9th Cir. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

McKenna, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case justified an injunction and the equitable jurisdiction of the court. The contending devices are for lighting and extinguishing gas by “one impulse,” through the agency of electricity. We think the defoudant’s device is an infringing imitation of claimant’s device. The substantial resemblances in structure and friction were clearly delineated by the learned judge who tried the ease in the circuit court, and we concur in his reasoning and conclusions. Judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McKenna, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case justified an injunction and the equitable jurisdiction of the court. The contending devices are for lighting and extinguishing gas by “one impulse,” through the agency of electricity. We think the defoudant’s device is an infringing imitation of claimant’s device. The substantial resemblances in structure and friction were clearly delineated by the learned judge who tried the ease in the circuit court, and we concur in his reasoning and conclusions. Judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 F. 754, 2 C.C.A. 495, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henzel-v-california-electrical-works-ca9-1892.