Henuy v. La Compagnie Generale Transatlantique

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Henuy v. La Compagnie Generale Transatlantique

96 F. 497, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3260

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedApril 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 96 F. 497 (Henuy v. La Compagnie Generale Transatlantique) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henuy v. La Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 96 F. 497, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3260 (circtsdny 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBF Circuit Judge.

“It is thoroughly seífíei that under the act of Augur*. At 1888, the circuit court of the United States has no jurisdiction, >!' c original or by removal from a state court, of a suit as one arising under the constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States, unless that appears by the plaintiff’s statement to he a necessary part of his claim.” Railway Co. v. Lewis (March 20, 1899) 19 Sup. Ct. 451. A careful re-examination of the conc’Jaint wholly fails to disclose any provision of constitution, stature, or trea ty which is made by such complaint a necessary part of plaintiff’s claim. The former decision, remanding the cause, will not be disturbed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBF Circuit Judge.

“It is thoroughly seífíei that under the act of Augur*. At 1888, the circuit court of the United States has no jurisdiction, >!' c original or by removal from a state court, of a suit as one arising under the constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States, unless that appears by the plaintiff’s statement to he a necessary part of his claim.” Railway Co. v. Lewis (March 20, 1899) 19 Sup. Ct. 451. A careful re-examination of the conc’Jaint wholly fails to disclose any provision of constitution, stature, or trea ty which is made by such complaint a necessary part of plaintiff’s claim. The former decision, remanding the cause, will not be disturbed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 F. 497, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henuy-v-la-compagnie-generale-transatlantique-circtsdny-1899.