Hentze v. Curry Chevrolet Sales & Service, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hentze v. Curry Chevrolet Sales & Service, Inc.

54 A.D.2d 556, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13870

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 20, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 556 (Hentze v. Curry Chevrolet Sales & Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hentze v. Curry Chevrolet Sales & Service, Inc., 54 A.D.2d 556, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, (1) defendants appeal from so much of [557]*557an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 8, 1976, as denied that branch of their motion which sought to strike the demand for punitive damages from plaintiffs’ first cause of action and (2) plaintiffs cross-appeal from the balance of the order, which granted the branches of defendants’ motion which sought to strike the demand for punitive damages from the second and third causes of action. Order modified by striking therefrom the words "granted to the extent of striking the demand for exemplary damages from the second and third causes of action”, and by substituting therefor the words "granted in all respects”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see EPTL 11-3.2, subd [b]; cf. Blessington v McCrory Stores Corp., 198 Mise 291, 302, affd 279 App Div 806, affd 305 NY 140). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia to recover damages for wrongful death and personal injuries, (1) defendants appeal from so much of [557]*557an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 8, 1976, as denied that branch of their motion which sought to strike the demand for punitive damages from plaintiffs’ first cause of action and (2) plaintiffs cross-appeal from the balance of the order, which granted the branches of defendants’ motion which sought to strike the demand for punitive damages from the second and third causes of action. Order modified by striking therefrom the words "granted to the extent of striking the demand for exemplary damages from the second and third causes of action”, and by substituting therefor the words "granted in all respects”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see EPTL 11-3.2, subd [b]; cf. Blessington v McCrory Stores Corp., 198 Mise 291, 302, affd 279 App Div 806, affd 305 NY 140). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 556, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hentze-v-curry-chevrolet-sales-service-inc-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack