Home/Utah Supreme Court/Hentsch Henchoz & Cie v. Gubbay

Hentsch Henchoz & Cie v. Gubbay

2005 UT 3, 106 P.3d 718, 517 Utah Adv. Rep. 3, 2005 Utah LEXIS 4, 2005 WL 43411
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 11, 2005
DocketNo. 20020683
StatusPublished

This text of 2005 UT 3 (Hentsch Henchoz & Cie v. Gubbay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hentsch Henchoz & Cie v. Gubbay, 2005 UT 3, 106 P.3d 718, 517 Utah Adv. Rep. 3, 2005 Utah LEXIS 4, 2005 WL 43411 (Utah 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

T1 This matter is before the court on its own order to show cause. Appellants Philippe D. David Gubbay, Capital Suisse, S.A., Capital Suisse, Inc., Zooley Services Limited, Zooley of Utah, Inc., and Fernland Limited have failed to comply with this court's decision in the above-captioned matter. See Hentsch Henchoz & Cie v. Gubbay, 2004 UT 64, 97 P.3d 1283. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that their appeal be dismissed.

112 Having disqualified themselves, Justice PARRISH and Justice NEHRING do not participate herein; Court of Appeals Judge GREGORY K. ORME and Fifth District Judge G. RAND BEACHAM sat.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hentsch Henchoz & Cie v. Gubbay
2004 UT 64 (Utah Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2005 UT 3, 106 P.3d 718, 517 Utah Adv. Rep. 3, 2005 Utah LEXIS 4, 2005 WL 43411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hentsch-henchoz-cie-v-gubbay-utah-2005.