Henton v. Brown

157 So. 2d 238, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1954
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 30, 1963·No. No. 1004·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

SAVOY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. The present plaintiff-employee was discharged from her employment for fighting on the job. The question involved is whether her misconduct in this connection was sufficiently grave as to constitute misconduct connected with her employment sufficient to disqualify her from unemployment compensation benefits. LSA-R.S. 23:1601(2).

For the reasons set forth in a companion •case this day decided, Williams v. Brown, La.App., 157 So.2d 237, which involved the other employee engaged in the same fight during the course of employment for the same employer, we have determined that the plaintiff should not be denied unemployment compensation benefits because of the single hotheaded incident involved herein.

For the foregoing reasons, we find that the plaintiff-appellant is entitled to unemployment compensation benefits for which she makes claim. The judgment appealed from is therefore annulled and set aside, and the case remanded to the Board of Review for further proceedings in accordance with our decision.

Reversed and remanded.

HOOD, J., dissents.

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

. CULPEPPER and HOOD, JJ., are of the opinion a rehearing should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henton v. Brown, 157 So. 2d 238, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1954 (La. Ct. App. 1963).

157 So. 2d 238 (Henton v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kliebert v. Peavey Co.
503 So. 2d 141 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Randle v. Adm'r, La. Office of Employment SEC.
499 So. 2d 488 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
Brown v. Lockwood
380 So. 2d 685 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1980)
Rankin v. Doyal
223 So. 2d 214 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)