Henthorne v. Kimball
This text of 252 A.D. 758 (Henthorne v. Kimball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order vacating order of certiorari reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In so far as article 78 of the Civil Practice Act and chapter 103 of the Laws of 1936 are in conflict with respect to the appellant’s right to commence a certiorari proceeding, the provisions of the latter statute are operative. While section 8 of chapter 103 of the Laws of 1936 permits the appellant to make application for a rehearing within twelve months after dismissal, the following section limits his time within which to seek review by certiorari to “ within sixty days after the conviction.” In our opinion, therefore, subdivision 3 of section 1286 of the Civil Practice Act does not contemplate the postponement for more than one year of the right of petitioner to commence a certiorari proceeding. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 758, 298 N.Y.S. 869, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henthorne-v-kimball-nyappdiv-1937.