Henson v. Putnam

180 S.E.2d 269, 123 Ga. App. 254, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 1182
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 18, 1971
Docket45624
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 180 S.E.2d 269 (Henson v. Putnam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henson v. Putnam, 180 S.E.2d 269, 123 Ga. App. 254, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 1182 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

This is a wrongful death suit arising out of an auto collision in which defendant gained a verdict and judgment. Plaintiff appeals from the order overruling his motion for new trial.

1. The trial court charged the jury on the law of accident, i.e., an injury which occurred without being caused by the negligence of either party. Exception was made that the evidence did not warrant it. According to the plaintiff’s evidence defendant entered a highway from a private driveway into the path of the plaintiff’s deceased husband, causing him to swerve and collide with a third vehicle approaching from the opposite direction and in the opposite lane. The defendant’s evidence on the other hand was to the effect that he did not drive his vehicle out into the highway; that the deceased had room to pass in his lane of travel; and that the cause of the collision was the high rate of speed of the deceased and his attendant loss of control of the vehicle. This evidence plainly shows that the death of plaintiff’s husband was due to his own negligence, to that of the defendant, or to both. Charging the law of accident under these circumstances is cause for reversal. Atlantic C. L. R. Co. v. Jones, 132 Ga. 189, 196 (63 SE 834); Everett v. Clegg, 213 Ga. 168 (97 SE2d 689); Toles v. Hair, 83 Ga. App. 144 (63 SE2d 3); Sheppard v. Sheppard, 114 Ga. App. 451 (151 SE2d 883).

2. The other enumerations of error either have no merit or are not likely to recur when this case is retried.

Judgment reversed.

Quillian and Whitman, JJ., concur. *255 Mitchell & Mitchell, Warren N. Coppedge, Jr., James B. Lang-ford, for appellant. Chance & Maddox, R. F. Chance, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simms v. Camp Concrete Co.
275 S.E.2d 357 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Compher v. Georgia Waste Systems, Inc.
273 S.E.2d 200 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Cohran v. Douglasville Concrete Products, Inc.
264 S.E.2d 507 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Stanfield v. Smith
262 S.E.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Georgia Farmers' Market Authority v. Dabbs
256 S.E.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 S.E.2d 269, 123 Ga. App. 254, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 1182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henson-v-putnam-gactapp-1971.