Henson v. Dodge

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Henson v. Dodge

15 S.W.2d 389, 179 Ark. 338, 1929 Ark. LEXIS 45

DecidedApril 1, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 15 S.W.2d 389 (Henson v. Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henson v. Dodge, 15 S.W.2d 389, 179 Ark. 338, 1929 Ark. LEXIS 45 (Ark. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The automobile was delivered to the defendant upon his giving the bond required by statute while the replevin suit for it was pending in the circuit court. The case was transferred, without objection, to the chancery court. The chancellor, upon application of the surety on the delivery bond of the defendant, transferred the custody of the property from the defendant to a third person. The chancery court did not exceed its jurisdiction, although it might be an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction. Therefore the petition for a writ of prohibition will be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The automobile was delivered to the defendant upon his giving the bond required by statute while the replevin suit for it was pending in the circuit court. The case was transferred, without objection, to the chancery court. The chancellor, upon application of the surety on the delivery bond of the defendant, transferred the custody of the property from the defendant to a third person. The chancery court did not exceed its jurisdiction, although it might be an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction. Therefore the petition for a writ of prohibition will be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 S.W.2d 389, 179 Ark. 338, 1929 Ark. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henson-v-dodge-ark-1929.