Henson v. Boal
767 N.W.2d 655, 483 Mich. 1133
Opinion
Andrew Jackson HENSON and Ethelene June Henson, Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants-Appellees,
v.
Scott BOAL, Defendant/Counter Plaintiff-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 5, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
WEAVER, J., would direct that oral argument be heard on the application for leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henson v. Boal, 767 N.W.2d 655, 483 Mich. 1133 (Mich. 2009).
767 N.W.2d 655 (Henson v. Boal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Hernandez
767 N.W.2d 655 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)