Henson v. Angelone
This text of 55 F. App'x 213 (Henson v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
George Henson, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting his motion to supplement the record in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition but denying further relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Henson v. Angelone, No. CA-01-59 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 F. App'x 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henson-v-angelone-ca4-2003.