Henson & Francesconi Co. v. Brown

Fifth Circuit

Henson & Francesconi Co. v. Brown

175 F. 1021, 99 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4208

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 8, 1910

DocketNo. 1,933

StatusPublished

This text of 175 F. 1021 (Henson & Francesconi Co. v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henson & Francesconi Co. v. Brown, 175 F. 1021, 99 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4208 (5th Cir. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this suit, upon an account stated for work and labor done, merchandise, goods, and chattels sold, and for money paid at the instance of the defendant, the defense being that the suit is one to recover on gambling transactions, the questions argued in this court relate entirely to the rulings of the trial judge on the sufficiency of pleadings. On consideration, we find no prejudicial error in any of the rulings complained of, aDd the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this suit, upon an account stated for work and labor done, merchandise, goods, and chattels sold, and for money paid at the instance of the defendant, the defense being that the suit is one to recover on gambling transactions, the questions argued in this court relate entirely to the rulings of the trial judge on the sufficiency of pleadings. On consideration, we find no prejudicial error in any of the rulings complained of, aDd the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 F. 1021, 99 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henson-francesconi-co-v-brown-ca5-1910.