Hensley v. Whiffin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Hensley v. Whiffin

6 N.W. 725, 54 Iowa 555

DecidedOctober 7, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.W. 725 (Hensley v. Whiffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hensley v. Whiffin, 6 N.W. 725, 54 Iowa 555 (iowa 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Adams, Oh. J.

1.mortgage: foreclosure * redemption.' No transfer to the plaintiff of any interest in the mortgage appeared of record. He was not, tlierefore, a necessary party to Morris’ foreclosure, «/ j. «/ He was affected by the foreclosure, and could only make statutory redemption. He allowed the time provided by statute to expire. He seems to have 'conceived the [557]*557idea that the time was extended by reason of the contract between Whiffin and George Lemley. But the foreclosure had extinguished Debolt’s interest, and the plaintiff never had any lien except upon Debolt’s interest.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams, Oh. J.

1.mortgage: foreclosure * redemption.' No transfer to the plaintiff of any interest in the mortgage appeared of record. He was not, tlierefore, a necessary party to Morris’ foreclosure, «/ j. «/ He was affected by the foreclosure, and could only make statutory redemption. He allowed the time provided by statute to expire. He seems to have 'conceived the [557]*557idea that the time was extended by reason of the contract between Whiffin and George Lemley. But the foreclosure had extinguished Debolt’s interest, and the plaintiff never had any lien except upon Debolt’s interest.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.W. 725, 54 Iowa 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hensley-v-whiffin-iowa-1880.