Hensley v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Hensley v. Walker

287 S.W.2d 160

DecidedFebruary 10, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 287 S.W.2d 160 (Hensley v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hensley v. Walker, 287 S.W.2d 160 (Ky. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellees, Maurice Walker, et al., filed their action against A. B. Hensley,, et al., appellants, asserting their title to a tract of land in Clay County, Kentucky, and seeking to enjoin the appellants from cutting and removing timber therefrom and to recover damages in the sum of $1,250. Proof was taken and judgment was rendered-in favor •of appellees, including the award of $150 for damages. We have examined the record in the case and have read the briefs and find that the Chancellor was correct in his findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellees, Maurice Walker, et al., filed their action against A. B. Hensley,, et al., appellants, asserting their title to a tract of land in Clay County, Kentucky, and seeking to enjoin the appellants from cutting and removing timber therefrom and to recover damages in the sum of $1,250. Proof was taken and judgment was rendered-in favor •of appellees, including the award of $150 for damages. We have examined the record in the case and have read the briefs and find that the Chancellor was correct in his findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 S.W.2d 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hensley-v-walker-kyctapp-1956.