Hensley v. Tarpey

7 Cal. 288
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1857·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Murray, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., and Terry, J., concurring.

On the trial of this cause in the Court below, no sufficient predicate was laid for the introduction of certified copies of the original grant and other documents, and the evidence being only secondary, was properly rejected.

The Courts of this State are not bound to take official notice of the rules adopted for the regulation of the various departments of the federal government, or those established by the Board of Land Commissioners or Surveyor-General of the United States for California. If these officers have adopted a rule, refusing to allow original papers to be taken from the the files, that fact should have been shown by affidavit, before evidence of their contents could be admitted.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hensley v. Tarpey, 7 Cal. 288 (Cal. 1857).

7 Cal. 288 (Hensley v. Tarpey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of St. Louis v. Niehaus
139 S.W. 450 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
United States v. Williams
6 Mont. 379 (Montana Supreme Court, 1887)
In re Estate of Woodworth
31 Cal. 595 (California Supreme Court, 1867)
Soto v. Kroder
19 Cal. 87 (California Supreme Court, 1861)
Fallon v. Dougherty
12 Cal. 104 (California Supreme Court, 1859)
Bagley v. Eaton
10 Cal. 126 (California Supreme Court, 1858)