Hensley v. State

363 So. 2d 352, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16781
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 1978·No. No. 77-1839·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, we agree with appellant that the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served in jail as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover it was error for the trial court to assess court costs against appellant after he had been adjudged insolvent. Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976). Therefore, we reverse the order assessing costs against appellant and release appellant from any obligation to pay these costs.

We remand the case to the trial court for correction of sentence. Appellant does not have to be present for this proceeding.

SCHEB, A. C. J., and OTT and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hensley v. State, 363 So. 2d 352, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16781 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

363 So. 2d 352 (Hensley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Iannucci v. State
400 So. 2d 139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Brown v. State
400 So. 2d 510 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Armstrong v. State
377 So. 2d 205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)