Hensley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hensley v. State

363 So. 2d 352, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16781

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 19, 1978

DocketNo. 77-1839

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 363 So. 2d 352 (Hensley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hensley v. State, 363 So. 2d 352, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16781 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, we agree with appellant that the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served in jail as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover it was error for the trial court to assess court costs against appellant after he had been adjudged insolvent. Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976). Therefore, we reverse the order assessing costs against appellant and release appellant from any obligation to pay these costs.

We remand the case to the trial court for correction of sentence. Appellant does not have to be present for this proceeding.

SCHEB, A. C. J., and OTT and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, we agree with appellant that the present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served in jail as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975) requires. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover it was error for the trial court to assess court costs against appellant after he had been adjudged insolvent. Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976). Therefore, we reverse the order assessing costs against appellant and release appellant from any obligation to pay these costs.

We remand the case to the trial court for correction of sentence. Appellant does not have to be present for this proceeding.

SCHEB, A. C. J., and OTT and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

363 So. 2d 352, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hensley-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack