Hensley v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hensley v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol. Read the opinion of the Court — 806 F. Supp. 2d 86
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 24, 2011·No. Civil Action No. 2010-0636·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SCOTT HENSLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 10-636 (RJL) ) OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF ) THE CAPITOL, ) ) STEPHEN AYERS, the Architect of the ) Capitol, in his personal capacity, ) ) REBECCA TISCIONE, a retired ) employee of the Architect of the ) Capitol, in her personal capacity, ) ) EVELYN GOODWIN, an employee of ) the Architect of the Capitol, in her ) personal capacity, ) ) TONDA CAVE, an employee of the ) Architect of the Capitol, in her personal ) capacity, ) ) EDGARD MARTINEZ, an employee of ) the Architect of the Capitol, in his ) personal capacity, ) ) WILLIAM WEIDMEYER, an ) employee of the Architect of the ) Capitol, in his personal capacity, ) ) and ) ) WILLIAM MILLER, an employee of ) the Architect of the Capitol, in his ) personal capacity, ) ) Defundanb. ) '10

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this t/J. t.~ day of August, 2011, hereby

ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss [#9] is GRANTED; it is

further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

ruc~~ United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hensley v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol, (D.D.C. 2011).

Hensley v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol (Hensley v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.