Hensley v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
SCOTT HENSLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 10-636 (RJL) ) OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT OF ) THE CAPITOL, ) ) STEPHEN AYERS, the Architect of the ) Capitol, in his personal capacity, ) ) REBECCA TISCIONE, a retired ) employee of the Architect of the ) Capitol, in her personal capacity, ) ) EVELYN GOODWIN, an employee of ) the Architect of the Capitol, in her ) personal capacity, ) ) TONDA CAVE, an employee of the ) Architect of the Capitol, in her personal ) capacity, ) ) EDGARD MARTINEZ, an employee of ) the Architect of the Capitol, in his ) personal capacity, ) ) WILLIAM WEIDMEYER, an ) employee of the Architect of the ) Capitol, in his personal capacity, ) ) and ) ) WILLIAM MILLER, an employee of ) the Architect of the Capitol, in his ) personal capacity, ) ) Defundanb. ) '10
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this t/J. t.~ day of August, 2011, hereby
ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Dismiss [#9] is GRANTED; it is
further
ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
ruc~~ United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hensley v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol (Hensley v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.