Henslee v. Stamps

72 S.E. 898, 137 Ga. 114, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 319
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 15, 1911·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

No provision is made for the caveat of a will offered for probate in common form. The application of the plaintiff in error was in the nature of a caveat to a will already probated in common form; it was defective as a technical motion to set aside the judgment of probate, as no illegality in the judgment was alleged; and it is not good as an application for the executor to prove the will in solemn form, in that there was no prayer for the executor to probate the will in solemn form or for citation to the heirs of the testator. See, in this connection: Books v. Brown, 125 Ga. 122 (53 S. E. 583) ; Bullard v. Wynn, 134 Ga. 636 (68 S. E. 439) ; Civil Code (1910), § 3856 et seq.

Judgment affirmed.

All the'Justices'concur, except Beak, J., absent, and Bill, J., not presiding. Appeal. Before Judge Edwards. Douglas superior court. September 21, 1910. J. S. James, for plaintiff in error. J. E. McLarty,-contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henslee v. Stamps, 72 S.E. 898, 137 Ga. 114, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 319 (Ga. 1911).

72 S.E. 898 (Henslee v. Stamps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freeman v. Mobley
444 S.E.2d 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Jones v. Dean
3 S.E.2d 894 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Abercrombie v. Hair
196 S.E. 447 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Johnson v. Ellis
158 S.E. 39 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Young v. Freeman
113 S.E. 204 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)