Hensle v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.

171 A.D. 931, 155 N.Y.S. 1112

This text of 171 A.D. 931 (Hensle v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hensle v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co., 171 A.D. 931, 155 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think, upon the evidence, that the finding that the deceased was free from contributory negligence is not sustained. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed; the finding that the deceased was not guilty of contributory negligence is reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Smith, JJ.; Ingraham, P. J., and Clarke, J., dissented and voted for affirmance. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D. 931, 155 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hensle-v-edison-electric-illuminating-co-nyappdiv-1915.