Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States

17 Cust. Ct. 376, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 948
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Cust. Ct. 327
United States Customs Court·Decided October 16, 1946·No. No. 6442; Entry No. 728287, etc.·Published

Opinion

Hínchelos, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation ofyounsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of [377]*377the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States, 17 Cust. Ct. 376, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 948 (cusc 1946).

17 Cust. Ct. 376 (Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.