Home/Superior Court of New York/Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.

Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.

21 N.Y.S. 1135
CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo
DecidedJanuary 18, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 21 N.Y.S. 1135 (Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co., 21 N.Y.S. 1135 (superctny 1893).

Opinion

DUGRO, J.

A careful examination of the papers fails to show_ any improper exercise of discretion by the court at special term. The original complaint sufficed for one kind of relief. The supplemental complaint is but for more extensive relief. Latham v. Richards, 15 Hun, 129. Order affirmed, with §10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 N.Y.S. 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henschel-v-harlem-reporter-co-superctny-1893.