Home/The Superior Court of New York City/Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.

Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.

2 Misc. 572
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided January 15, 1893·Published

Opinion

Dttgeo, J.

A careful examination of the papers fails to show any improper exercise of discretion by the court at Special Term. The original complaint sufficed for one kind of relief. The supplemental complaint is but for more extensive relief. Latham v. Richards, 15 Hun, 129.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.

Sedgwick, Oh. J., and Gtldeksleeve, J., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co., 2 Misc. 572 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

2 Misc. 572 (Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.