Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.
2 Misc. 572
This text of 2 Misc. 572 (Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Henschel v. Harlem Reporter Co., 2 Misc. 572 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
A careful examination of the papers fails to show any improper exercise of discretion by the court at Special Term. The original complaint sufficed for one kind of relief. The supplemental complaint is but for more extensive relief. Latham v. Richards, 15 Hun, 129.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs.
Sedgwick, Oh. J., and Gtldeksleeve, J., concur.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Misc. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henschel-v-harlem-reporter-co-nysuperctnyc-1893.