Henry Wolf and Pearl M. Wolf, His Wife, Florence Wolf and Edward Eugene Wolf v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, a Municipal Corporation, Altis C. Smith v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, a Municipal Corporation

239 F.2d 643
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 1957
Docket5440_1
StatusPublished

This text of 239 F.2d 643 (Henry Wolf and Pearl M. Wolf, His Wife, Florence Wolf and Edward Eugene Wolf v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, a Municipal Corporation, Altis C. Smith v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, a Municipal Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry Wolf and Pearl M. Wolf, His Wife, Florence Wolf and Edward Eugene Wolf v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, a Municipal Corporation, Altis C. Smith v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, a Municipal Corporation, 239 F.2d 643 (10th Cir. 1957).

Opinion

239 F.2d 643

Henry WOLF and Pearl M. Wolf, his wife, Florence Wolf and
Edward Eugene Wolf, Appellants,
v.
The CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, a municipal corporation, Appellee.
Altis C. SMITH, Appellant,
v.
The CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

Nos. 5439, 5440.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 18, 1956.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 21, 1957.

Kenneth G. Speir, Newton, Kan. (Vernon A. Stroberg and Herbert H. Sizemore, Newton, Kan., on the brief), for appellants.

Robert B. Morton, Wichita, Kan. (Fred W. Aley and Paul J. Donaldson, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, MURRAH and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion heretofore filed herein on December 6, 1956, is hereby withdrawn and the judgments entered on that date in the above-styled causes are vacated.

On the authority of Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 77 S.Ct. 200, the judgments entered below in the above-styled causes are reversed and they are remanded, with instructions to enter judgment in each of them in favor of the plaintiffs, as prayed for in their respective complaints.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. City of Hutchinson
352 U.S. 112 (Supreme Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 F.2d 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-wolf-and-pearl-m-wolf-his-wife-florence-wolf-and-edward-eugene-ca10-1957.