Henry Webb v. Unknown Gensler

Eighth Circuit

Henry Webb v. Unknown Gensler

351 F. App'x 159

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedNovember 10, 2009

Docket09-1052

StatusUnpublished

This text of 351 F. App'x 159 (Henry Webb v. Unknown Gensler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry Webb v. Unknown Gensler, 351 F. App'x 159 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Henry Webb appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Northstar Indus., Inc. v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 576 F.3d 827, 831 (8th Cir.2009), we agree with the district court that dismissal was proper because Webb failed to state a section 1983 claim. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Henry Webb appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Northstar Indus., Inc. v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 576 F.3d 827, 831 (8th Cir.2009), we agree with the district court that dismissal was proper because Webb failed to state a section 1983 claim. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

351 F. App'x 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-webb-v-unknown-gensler-ca8-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack