Henry Webb v. Unknown Gensler

Eighth Circuit

Henry Webb v. Unknown Gensler

351 F. App'x 159

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 10, 2009·No. 09-1052·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Henry Webb appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Northstar Indus., Inc. v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 576 F.3d 827, 831 (8th Cir.2009), we agree with the district court that dismissal was proper because Webb failed to state a section 1983 claim. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Henry Webb appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, see Northstar Indus., Inc. v. Merrill Lynch & Co., 576 F.3d 827, 831 (8th Cir.2009), we agree with the district court that dismissal was proper because Webb failed to state a section 1983 claim. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Henry Webb v. Unknown Gensler, 351 F. App'x 159 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

351 F. App'x 159 (Henry Webb v. Unknown Gensler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related