Henry v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 252
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 30, 1958
DocketNo. 62648; protest 322476-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 252 (Henry v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 252 (cusc 1958).

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the grating machines are not in chief value of steel, but are in chief value of tin plate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Cust. Ct. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-united-states-cusc-1958.