Henry v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 252
United States Customs Court·Decided December 30, 1958·No. No. 62648; protest 322476-K (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the grating machines are not in chief value of steel, but are in chief value of tin plate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henry v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 252 (cusc 1958).
42 Cust. Ct. 252 (Henry v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.