Henry v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Henry v. United States

31 Cust. Ct. 400, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1274

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 1, 1953

DocketReap. Dec. 8253; Entry No. 705110

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Cust. Ct. 400 (Henry v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 400, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1274 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, of the item of 478 hoods invoiced at $24.01 per dozen was in fact $24.01 per dozen net packed and that the foreign value thereof was no higher. This case is hereby submitted.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the item of 478 hoods invoiced at $24.01 per dozen, and that such value was $24.01 per dozen net packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise is freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, of the item of 478 hoods invoiced at $24.01 per dozen was in fact $24.01 per dozen net packed and that the foreign value thereof was no higher. This case is hereby submitted.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the item of 478 hoods invoiced at $24.01 per dozen, and that such value was $24.01 per dozen net packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Cust. Ct. 400, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-united-states-cusc-1953.