Henry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Henry v. State

297 S.W.3d 665, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680, 2009 WL 4279418

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 24, 2009

DocketED 92611

StatusPublished

This text of 297 S.W.3d 665 (Henry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry v. State, 297 S.W.3d 665, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680, 2009 WL 4279418 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

*666 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Henry appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for then* information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*666 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Henry appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for then* information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 S.W.3d 665, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680, 2009 WL 4279418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack