Henry v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Henry v. State

183 S.E. 199, 52 Ga. App. 359, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 631

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 9, 1936

Docket25370

StatusPublished

This text of 183 S.E. 199 (Henry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry v. State, 183 S.E. 199, 52 Ga. App. 359, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 631 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted of possessing burglary tools. The evidence, though wholly circumstantial, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial based upon the usual general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted of possessing burglary tools. The evidence, though wholly circumstantial, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt; and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial based upon the usual general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 S.E. 199, 52 Ga. App. 359, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-state-gactapp-1936.