Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Henry v. State

Henry v. State

76 S.E. 1078, 12 Ga. App. 221, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 504
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 4, 1913
Docket4262
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 S.E. 1078 (Henry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry v. State, 76 S.E. 1078, 12 Ga. App. 221, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 504 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinions

Russell, J.

The evidence of an incriminating character depending solely upon the testimony of an accomplice, and there being no sufficient circumstance of corroboration aliunde the testimony of the accomplice, connecting the accused with the offense, the verdict was unauthorized.

Judgment reversed.

Pottle, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hendricks v. State
29 S.E.2d 447 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 S.E. 1078, 12 Ga. App. 221, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-state-gactapp-1913.