Henry v. State

158 So. 3d 752, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2457, 2015 WL 735684
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Henry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3954
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 2015·No. No. 1D14-2134·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court’s independent review of the record and pertinent legal authority, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and In re Anders Briefs, 581 So.2d 149 (Fla.1991), reveals no meritorious point which might support reversal of the conviction and sentence. We commend An-ders counsel for his brief on Appellant’s behalf, which examined points of possible merit to assist in this court’s review. The brief demonstrates a thorough review of the record and meticulous application of the law governing the trial proceedings, including citations to the record and to legal authorities.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry v. State, 158 So. 3d 752, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2457, 2015 WL 735684 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

158 So. 3d 752 (Henry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re Anders Briefs
581 So. 2d 149 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)