Henry v. State Ex Rel. Armstrong

117 So. 633, 218 Ala. 78, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 157
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 28, 1928·No. 6 Div. 44.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding mandamus to the- respondent county treasurer directing the payment of a warrant covering the salary of petitioner, register of the circuit court, under the Act approved August 13, 1927 (Gen. Acts 1927, p. 268).

This appeal and that styled Henry, Treas., v. Hartsfield, 117 So. 6216,1 present similar questions as to the constitutionality of statutes, and have been considered together. On the authority of the Hartsfield Case, the act here involved (Gen. Acts 1927, p. 268) is held invalid. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and one is here rendered denying the writ of mandamus.

Reversed and rendered.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE, SOMERVILLE, and BROWN, JJ., concur. GARDNER, THOMAS, and BOULDIN, JJ., dissent.

On Rehearing.

Application for rehearing granted, judgment of reversal set aside, and affirmed, on authority of Henry v. State ex rel. Hartsfield, ante, p. 71, 117 So. 626.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry v. State Ex Rel. Armstrong, 117 So. 633, 218 Ala. 78, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 157 (Ala. 1928).

117 So. 633 (Henry v. State Ex Rel. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. State Ex Rel. Hartsfield
117 So. 626 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)