Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Henry v. Ringle

Henry v. Ringle

161 S.E. 269, 44 Ga. App. 293, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 681
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 11, 1931
Docket21749
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 161 S.E. 269 (Henry v. Ringle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry v. Ringle, 161 S.E. 269, 44 Ga. App. 293, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 681 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

Under all the facts of the ease, including the admissions of W. T. Henry, guardian, made in open court, the judge did not err in striking said Henry’s response to the rule nisi (served upon him in a proceeding to distribute funds), upon the ground that the response showed on its face that the debt in question was one dischargeable in bankruptcy, and properly passed an order directing that the funds be paid over to Ringle, the receiver.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and BloodiuoHh, JJ., concur. Harvey H. Tisinger, Willis Smith, for plaintiff. Grant & Long, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garmon v. Davis
12 S.E.2d 209 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Hartsfield Co. v. Newlin
176 S.E. 516 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 269, 44 Ga. App. 293, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-ringle-gactapp-1931.