Henry v. Ricketts
This text of 11 F. Cas. 1188 (Henry v. Ricketts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
said that If the jurors implicated could be heard, it must be as witnesses; and then the other jurors must be examined, whieh would produce mutual recriminations; and that the general rule in this court, and in other courts, is, not to hear the testimony of jurors upon an allegation of misbehavior. THE COURT refused to grant a new trial.
Mr. Taylor, for plaintiff, wished to except to the decision of the court. THE COURT said they should not sign a bill of exceptions, as the supreme court of the United States had decided that a writ of error would not lie to the refusal of a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. Cas. 1188, 1 Cranch 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-ricketts-circtddc-1809.