Henry v. President
4 How. Pr. 183
This text of 4 How. Pr. 183 (Henry v. President) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Henry v. President, 4 How. Pr. 183 (N.Y. 1847).
Opinion
This was an action of assumpsit brought by the Bank of Salina against Henry & Pierce upon a promissory note signed by Pierce as principal and Henry as surety, payable to the bank and not negotiable. The defence was usury. The question was, as to the privilege of the principal witness, from testifying on the question of usury. (Reported 1 Comst. 83.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 How. Pr. 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-president-ny-1847.