Henry v. Mississippi

Supreme Court

Henry v. Mississippi

392 U.S. 931, 88 S. Ct. 2276

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 17, 1968

DocketNo. 1090

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 392 U.S. 931 (Henry v. Mississippi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry v. Mississippi, 392 U.S. 931, 88 S. Ct. 2276 (1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied without prejudice to the bringing of a proceeding for relief in federal habeas corpus. Neither this disposition, nor the proceedings in the Mississippi courts pursuant to our remand, 379 U. S. 443, shall in any way affect petitioner’s entitlement to the costs of $1,367.99 ordered in our mandate of March 2, 1965, to be paid petitioner by the State of Mississippi. See 381 U. S. 908 (respondent’s motion to retax costs denied). But the proceedings in that regard initiated in the Mississippi Supreme Court by petitioner’s motion of April 1, 1965, are still pending and our disposition will enable that court to proceed to effectuate our mandate.

Except with reference to the matter of costs, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart would deny certiorari without more.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. Miss. Certiorari denied without prejudice to the bringing of a proceeding for relief in federal habeas corpus. Neither this disposition, nor the proceedings in the Mississippi courts pursuant to our remand, 379 U. S. 443, shall in any way affect petitioner’s entitlement to the costs of $1,367.99 ordered in our mandate of March 2, 1965, to be paid petitioner by the State of Mississippi. See 381 U. S. 908 (respondent’s motion to retax costs denied). But the proceedings in that regard initiated in the Mississippi Supreme Court by petitioner’s motion of April 1, 1965, are still pending and our disposition will enable that court to proceed to effectuate our mandate.

Except with reference to the matter of costs, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart would deny certiorari without more.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

392 U.S. 931, 88 S. Ct. 2276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-mississippi-scotus-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack