Henry v. Mississippi

Supreme Court

Henry v. Mississippi

388 U.S. 901

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 12, 1967·No. No. 6·Published

Opinion

Respondent’s motions that this Court reinstate the judgment of conviction and retax costs are denied. It is noted that the opinion of the Mississippi Supreme Court states: “If this case were again before us, we would reaffirm our former opinion and judgment.” Further proceedings in the cause should be addressed to any new final judgment which may be entered by the Mississippi courts. Cf. United States v. Shotwell Mfg. Co., 355 U. S. 233, 245-246; Campbell v. United States, 365 U. S. 85, 99.

Mr. Justice Black concurs in the denial of respondent’s motions.

[For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., 381 U. S. 908.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respondent’s motions that this Court reinstate the judgment of conviction and retax costs are denied. It is noted that the opinion of the Mississippi Supreme Court states: “If this case were again before us, we would reaffirm our former opinion and judgment.” Further proceedings in the cause should be addressed to any new final judgment which may be entered by the Mississippi courts. Cf. United States v. Shotwell Mfg. Co., 355 U. S. 233, 245-246; Campbell v. United States, 365 U. S. 85, 99.

Mr. Justice Black concurs in the denial of respondent’s motions.

[For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., 381 U. S. 908.]

Henry v. Mississippi, 388 U.S. 901 (1967).

Pincite

388 U.S. 901 (Henry v. Mississippi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related