Henry v. Mississippi
This text of 388 U.S. 901 (Henry v. Mississippi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent’s motions that this Court reinstate the judgment of conviction and retax costs are denied. It is noted that the opinion of the Mississippi Supreme Court states: “If this case were again before us, we would reaffirm our former opinion and judgment.” Further proceedings in the cause should be addressed to any new final judgment which may be entered by the Mississippi courts. Cf. United States v. Shotwell Mfg. Co., 355 U. S. 233, 245-246; Campbell v. United States, 365 U. S. 85, 99.
[For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., 381 U. S. 908.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
388 U.S. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-mississippi-scotus-1967.