Henry v. Lemac Builders, Inc.

245 So. 2d 115
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 1971·No. No. 70-1070·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal presents a question of venue. The appellant urges that the proper venue is Orange County where the defendant resides or Brevard County where the lease arose. The lease sets forth that the rent is to be paid in Dade County; therefore, an action to recover rent may be brought in Dade County. Williams v. Aeroland Oil Co., 155 Fla. 114, 20 So.2d 346 (1944); M. A. Kite Co. v. A. C. Samford, Inc., 130 So.2d 99 (Fla.App.1961).

Appellant also attempts to present a question as to the pendency of a prior suit on the same cause of action but that point is not supported by the record. We expressly decline to pass on the point. It must appear from the record that the trial court had an opportunity to rule upon the issue for this court to undertake a consideration of the point. Permenter v. Bank of Green Cove Springs, 136 So.2d 377 (Fla.App.1962).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry v. Lemac Builders, Inc., 245 So. 2d 115 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

245 So. 2d 115 (Henry v. Lemac Builders, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mirabal v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE
553 So. 2d 1297 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
McCormick MacHinery, Inc. v. Julian E. Johnson & Sons, Inc.
523 So. 2d 651 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Prahl v. Johnson
323 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)