Henry v. Irwin

Supreme Court

Henry v. Irwin

270 U.S. 636, 46 S. Ct. 469

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 12, 1926·No. No. 158·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed upon the authority of McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147; (2) California Powder Works v. Davis & Co., 151 U. S. 389, 393; Goar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Consol. Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View R. R. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Yazoo & Miss. Valley R. R. Co. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed upon the authority of McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U. S. 168, 181; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239, 243; Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147; (2) California Powder Works v. Davis & Co., 151 U. S. 389, 393; Goar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 468, 470; Consol. Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View R. R. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Yazoo & Miss. Valley R. R. Co. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271.

Henry v. Irwin, 270 U.S. 636, 46 S. Ct. 469 (1926).

Pincite

270 U.S. 636 (Henry v. Irwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related