Henry v. Hirsch
140 A.D. 893, 125 N.Y.S. 1123
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1910·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Final order of the Municipal Court reversed, with costs, and proceeding dismissed on the ground that theré is no evidence that the tenant appellants were made parties to the foreclosure action, and not having attorned to the receiver they cannot be divested of possession of the demised premises in summary proceedings. (McDonald v. Cohen, 65 Misc. Rep. 489.) Woodward, Jenks, Thomas, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henry v. Hirsch, 140 A.D. 893, 125 N.Y.S. 1123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
140 A.D. 893 (Henry v. Hirsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Olive v. Levy
201 A.D. 262 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Baerlein v. Winter
103 Misc. 506 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Halperin v. Henry
144 A.D. 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)