Henry v. Henry

1 How. Pr. 167
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1845
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 167 (Henry v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry v. Henry, 1 How. Pr. 167 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Jewett, Justice.

The teste in the name of the present chief justice, is amendable; he thought the weight of evidence, as gathered from the papers, showed that defendant was in the county of Chenango; without however deciding that point, he was clearly of opinion that the copy of the writ delivered to the defendant at the time of service, was not such a copy as was contemplated by the statute. Service is made, by delivering a copy thereof, certified by the officer serving the same to the 'party required to be summoned, or by leaving such copy, &c. 2 R. S., 579, § 16. The copy served in this case was not certified by either the sheriff or his deputy; the word “copy” appeared upon it, but that could not be considered a certified copy by the officer within the meaning of the statute.

Motion granted with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-henry-nysupct-1845.