Henry v. Harris
This text of Henry v. Harris (Henry v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
James R. Henry, Appellant,
v.
Natasha R. Harris, Respondent.
Appeal From Greenville County
Henry F. Floyd, Circuit Court Judge
Joseph J. Watson, Circuit Court Judge
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-047
Heard October 22, 2003 - Filed August
23, 2004
AFFIRMED
Samuel Darryl Harms, of Harms Law Firm, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Robert D. Moseley, Jr. and Paul E. Hammack, both of Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Dunn v. Dunn, 298 S.C. 499, 381 S.E.2d 734 (1989); Otis Elevator, Inc. v. Hardin Constr. Co. Group, Inc., 316 S.C. 292, 450 S.E.2d 41 (1994).
MOORE, A.C.J., WALLER, BURNETT, PLEICONES, JJ., and Acting Justice James W. Johnson, Jr., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Henry v. Harris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-harris-sc-2004.