Henry v. Harris

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided August 23, 2004·No. 2004-MO-047·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court


James R. Henry,        Appellant,

v.

Natasha R. Harris,        Respondent.


Appeal From Greenville County
Henry F. Floyd, Circuit Court Judge
Joseph J. Watson, Circuit Court Judge
G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge


Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-047
Heard October 22, 2003 - Filed August 23, 2004


AFFIRMED


Samuel Darryl Harms, of Harms Law Firm, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Robert D. Moseley, Jr. and Paul E. Hammack, both of Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, of Greenville, for Respondent.


PER CURIAM:  Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: Dunn v. Dunn, 298 S.C. 499, 381 S.E.2d 734 (1989); Otis Elevator, Inc. v. Hardin Constr. Co. Group, Inc., 316 S.C. 292, 450 S.E.2d 41 (1994).

MOORE, A.C.J., WALLER, BURNETT, PLEICONES, JJ., and Acting Justice James W. Johnson, Jr., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Henry v. Harris, (S.C. 2004).

Henry v. Harris (Henry v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Otis Elevator, Inc. v. HARDIN CONST. CO. GROUP
450 S.E.2d 41 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1994)
Dunn v. Dunn
381 S.E.2d 734 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1989)