Henry v. Guidry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Henry v. Guidry

236 So. 2d 905, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 5067

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 18, 1970

DocketNo. 3116

StatusPublished

This text of 236 So. 2d 905 (Henry v. Guidry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Henry v. Guidry, 236 So. 2d 905, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 5067 (La. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

MILLER, Judge.

This is a companion case to and consolidated for trial with Barrett, et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al., 236 So.2d 900. Here plain[906]*906tiff, Harry J. Henry, the owner of the Honda driven by decedent, David Barrett, seeks to recover property damages against Joseph L. Guidry, father of Charles Guidry, minor driver of the offending automobile. Damages were stipulated at $195.00. The trial court rendered judgment against Joseph L. Guidry for the reasons assigned in Barrett. Defendant appeals to this Court.

For the reasons assigned in Barrett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al., supra, the trial court judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLER, Judge.

This is a companion case to and consolidated for trial with Barrett, et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al., 236 So.2d 900. Here plain[906]*906tiff, Harry J. Henry, the owner of the Honda driven by decedent, David Barrett, seeks to recover property damages against Joseph L. Guidry, father of Charles Guidry, minor driver of the offending automobile. Damages were stipulated at $195.00. The trial court rendered judgment against Joseph L. Guidry for the reasons assigned in Barrett. Defendant appeals to this Court.

For the reasons assigned in Barrett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al., supra, the trial court judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 So. 2d 905, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 5067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-guidry-lactapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack