Henry v. Green
This text of 4 Munf. 227 (Henry v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
pronounced the court’s opinion, “ that, the sheriff in this case not having returned that the plaintiff was bail for the appearance of the said James Ryburn, the judgment of the County Court is erroneous as to the plaintiff in error.”
Both judgments reversed, and judgment entered that the [231]*231defendant in error recover against the said James Ryburn
Munford suggested to the court the propriety of entering the judgment against the defendant and the sheriff; that officer having made himself liable by failing to make a proper return of the writ. But the court said that this could not be done, without giving the sheriff an opportunity of defence; and that, if the return was incor rect, the proper remedy of the plaintiff was by action against the sheriff
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Munf. 227, 18 Va. 227, 1814 Va. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-green-va-1814.