Henry v. Great Northern Railway Co.
47 P. 895, 16 Wash. 417, 1897 Wash. LEXIS 335
Opinion
This being an action at law for the recovery of money, and the original amount in controversy not exceeding the sum of $200, and the action not involving the legality of a tax, impost, assessment, toll, municipal fine, or the validity of a statute (constitution, art. 4, § 4), the appeal is dismissed, with costs against the appellant, hut not against the sureties upon the appeal bond, as we have no jurisdiction to affirm the judgment of the lower court. Grunewald v. West Coast Grocery Co., 11 Wash. 478 (39 Pac. 964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Henry v. Great Northern Railway Co., 47 P. 895, 16 Wash. 417, 1897 Wash. LEXIS 335 (Wash. 1897).
47 P. 895 (Henry v. Great Northern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Labell v. Campbell
128 So. 422 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Jones v. Jones
223 Ill. App. 214 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1921)
Johnston v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer Co.
154 P. 787 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)
Arthur D. Jones & Co. v. Cunningham
139 P. 612 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)
Davis v. Huth
86 P. 654 (Washington Supreme Court, 1906)
Davis v. Virges
81 P. 688 (Washington Supreme Court, 1905)
Huber v. Brown
48 P. 412 (Washington Supreme Court, 1897)