Henry v. Dennison

40 A.D.3d 1175, 833 N.Y.S.2d 418
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 3, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 40 A.D.3d 1175 (Henry v. Dennison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henry v. Dennison, 40 A.D.3d 1175, 833 N.Y.S.2d 418 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered September 15, 2006 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner was convicted in 1983 of depraved indifference murder in the second degree (see Penal Law § 125.25 [2]) and sentenced to 20 years to life in prison. In July 2005, he made his second appearance before the Board of Parole for parole release. At the conclusion of the hearing, his request was denied and he was ordered held for an additional 24 months. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging it. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

We find merit in petitioner’s argument that “the Board relied on incorrect information” in denying his request for parole release, by referring to his underlying criminal acts, which resulted in his conviction of depraved indifference murder, as intentional (see Matter of Lewis v Travis, 9 AD3d 800, 801 [2004]; see also People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288 [2006]; People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202 [2005]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266 [2004]). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and direct that a new hearing be held.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, determination annulled and matter remitted to the Board of Parole for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WASHINGTON, TROY v. ANNUCCI, ANTHONY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Washington v. Annucci
144 A.D.3d 1541 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Grune v. Board of Parole
41 A.D.3d 1014 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.D.3d 1175, 833 N.Y.S.2d 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henry-v-dennison-nyappdiv-2007.