Henry v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 CASE NO. 2:20-CV-116-DWC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EAJA 12 v. ATTORNEY’S FEES SECURITY, 14 Defendant. 15

Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs 16 Under EAJA. Dkt. 14. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 17 73, and Local Magistrate Judge Rule MJR 13. See also Dkt. 4. 18 Plaintiff requests fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, 19 (“EAJA”). Dkt. 14. Defendant filed a Response stating Defendant had no objection to the request 20 for fees. Dkt. 15. Based on the EAJA, attorney time itemization (Dkt. 14, p. 4), the relevant 21 record, and the Response, the Court orders an EAJA Award in the amount of EAJA attorney’s 22 fees of $5,892.95 and costs in the amount of $400.00 be awarded to Plaintiff. Astrue v. Ratliff, 23 560 U.S. 586, 591–97 (2010); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1920; 31 U.S.C. § 1304(a). 24 1 The Commissioner is directed to contact the U.S. Department of Treasury after this Order 2 is entered to determine if the EAJA Award is subject to any offset. If the U.S. Department of the 3 Treasury verifies to the Office of General Counsel that Plaintiff does not owe a debt and is not 4 subject to any offset, the government shall pay the EAJA Award directly to Todd R. Renda,

5 Plaintiff’s counsel. If there is an offset, any remainder shall be made payable to Plaintiff, based 6 on the Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program and standard practices, and the check shall 7 be mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel, Todd R. Renda, 6314 19th Street West, Suite 21, Tacoma, WA 8 98466. 9 Dated this 23rd day of September, 2020. 10 A 11 David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24